Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence Autologous Fascial Sling


Blaivas J. G. , Simma-Chiang V., Gul Z., Dayan L., KALKAN S. , Daniel M.

UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, vol.46, no.1, pp.41-54, 2019 (Journal Indexed in SCI) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 46 Issue: 1
  • Publication Date: 2019
  • Doi Number: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.014
  • Title of Journal : UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA
  • Page Numbers: pp.41-54

Abstract

This article describes the operative technique of autologous fascial pubovaginal sling (AFPVS) surgery, examines the senior author's outcomes with AFPVS, compares these outcomes with those of other large studies and meta-analyses, and compares the safety and efficacy of AFPVS with those of the synthetic midurethral sling (SMUS). Recently, the SMUS has become the treatment of choice for most surgeons. The efficacy of the SMUS remains unchallenged and comparable with that of AFPVS, but SMUS are associated with more severe complications. In the author's opinion, the AFPVS should remain the gold standard for treating SUI.